Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:48
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
A Closer Look At Uranus’s Moons Reveals a Surprising Dark Side - Gizmodo
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Astronomers discover a tiny star with a giant planet that should not exist - Earth.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Was Jimmy Carter a good President of the United States?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Scientists just learned the age of America's deepest canyon - SFGATE
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are mean nicknames to call my sister? She is always so mean to me.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.